RE: [sv-bc] Pre-Proposal to handle X-problems in RTL coding

From: Clifford E. Cummings <cliffc_at_.....>
Date: Tue Nov 06 2007 - 18:19:36 PST
Hi, Brad -

I believe there are other places in the LRM that suggest optional 
switches. The intent is to encourage their addition and to define a 
consistent behavior if added.

Regards - Cliff

At 05:58 PM 11/6/2007, you wrote:
> >It would be nice to permit vendors to add two optional switches
>
>Why would the vendors need permission from the LRM to add switches?
>
>-- Brad
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.

----------------------------------------------------
Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com
Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification Training


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Nov 6 18:19:57 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 06 2007 - 18:20:13 PST