So Tom and Steven favor specifying a top-to-bottom order (like a normal or priority case) instead of allowing any order of evaluation, which is what the LRM says now. I would also favor specifying the order. Anyone object? If there are no objections, I can rewrite the proposal along those lines. It would make the description much simpler, in my opinion. Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Nov 18 02:15:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 18 2007 - 02:15:35 PST