>From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com> >Oh, I'm certainly fine with disallowing side effects in unique case >completely. If we want to go that route, the whole issue is moot. Forbidding increment/decrement/assignment operators would be easy enough, but I don't see a practical way to disallow side effects from function calls except by forbidding function calls. That seems like overkill. If we want to take this route, I think it should take the form of saying that the behavior is undefined if there are side effects. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Nov 19 12:00:20 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 12:00:38 PST