[sv-bc] RE: [sv-ac] Re: name resolution

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Fri Nov 23 2007 - 08:50:59 PST
And I think we should apply a similar approach to macros. I don't think
we should reject improvements to the LRM just because they still leave
open some corners. 

Regards,
Shalom


> At this point I am trying to walk a fine line of getting 
> enough in the LRM to be able to direct implementors to the 
> correct approaches while being fully aware that there are 
> still many inconsistencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Nov 23 08:51:25 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 23 2007 - 08:51:39 PST