RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

From: Warmke, Doug <doug_warmke_at_.....>
Date: Tue Nov 27 2007 - 23:56:16 PST
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:03 AM
To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST


-You have until 8am PST, Monday, December 3, 2007 to respond
-An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
 voters respond with a YES vote.
-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
 The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference
call.
-Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note
       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). 

As of the November 12, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are:

Brad Pierce        
Shalom Bresticker  
Cliff Cummings      
Mark Hartoog        
Francoise Martinolle
Karen Pieper       
Dave Rich          
Steven Sharp       
Gordon Vreugdenhil 
Stu Sutherland 
Alex Gran
Don Mills
Heath Chambers
Tom Alsop
Doug Warmke
Mike Burns

SVDB  329 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=329

Will change vote on 329 to Yes once Gordon's No Vote
issues are resolved.
	
SVDB 1338 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1338

SVDB 1339 _X_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339

SVDB 1548 _X_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1548

SVDB 1571 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571

Will change vote on 1571 to Yes once Gordon's No Vote
issues are resolved.

SVDB 1619 _X_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619

SVDB 1957 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1957

Will change vote on 1957 to Yes once Gordon's No Vote
issues are resolved.


SVDB 2102 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102

SVDB 2106 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2106

Friendly amendment will change to Yes:
In the 2nd-to-last paragraph, I would like the following changed from:
"Specific data variables within a static task or function can be explicitly"
to:
"Specific data variables within a static task, function, or block can be explicitly"

SVDB 2152 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2152

SVDB 2163 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2163

SVDB 2169 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2169

SVDB 2170 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2170

SVDB 2178 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2178

SVDB 2184 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2184

Will change 2184 to Yes once Gordon's No Vote
issues are resolved.

SVDB 2217 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Nov 27 23:57:13 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 23:57:49 PST