RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

I think the proposal for 329 still has the following problem:

The BNF footnote says,

"A package_import_declaration in a module, interface, program header
shall be followed by a parameter_port_list or list_of_port_declarations,
or both."

That footnote appears in both the ansi and nonansi_headers.

But in nonansi_headers, a list_of_ports is used, not
list_of_port_declarations. Furthermore, list_of_ports has a non-optional
set of parentheses.

So the footnote is both wrong and unnecessary for nonansi_headers. 


Less important is that the proposal says,

"Declarations such as typedefs and constants declared in packages can be
referenced in module, interface or program port declarations"

I think that should be "parameter or port declarations".


Thanks,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.