RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

Yes, I need mean to mark "No" on my vote.  I had originally marked yes, but
then was concerned about how to handle the dependency on another proposal.
Can we incorporate 1957 into 1571 cleanly (without the strike-through text
in the 1957 portions, since that text not exist in the current LRM), and put
1957 on a back burner to be closed once 1571 has passed at least through the
champion's level?

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
Sutherland HDL, Inc.
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
503-692-0898
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 2:02 AM
> To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
> 
> Stu, 
> 
> > > SVDB 1571 _X_Yes   ___No  
> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571
> > 
> > I'm voting no only because I'm not sure how to best handle 
> > the dependency of
> > 1571 on 1957.  If 1957 passes all the way through the working 
> > group, then I have no problems with 1571.  If 1957 does not 
> > pass, however, then the proposal for 1571 needs to be 
> > rewritten.  Perhaps a better way to handle this dependency is 
> > to fold 1957 into this proposal, and close 1957 as a duplicate.
> 
> I assume you meant to put your X on No, not Yes.
> 
> There is no reason 1957 should not pass. It was unaminously passed by
> SV-BC and the only comment in the Champions was that the quotes should
> be straight, not smart. That could even have been a simple Note to the
> Editor.
> 
> However, 1571 (latest version) incorporates 1957 and if passed, would
> supercede 1957 (and should say so, I guess). 
> 
> I would not close 1957 as a duplicate, though, because 1957 
> would still
> need to be implemented if 1571 does not pass.
> 
> Shalom
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.