Please change my vote on Mantis 1339 to Yes, based on the V4 version. Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland Sutherland HDL, Inc. stuart@sutherland-hdl.com 503-692-0898 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Alsop, Thomas R > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:48 AM > To: Bresticker, Shalom; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; Maidment, > Matthew R; sv-bc@server.eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST > > Actually I agree as well. The first time I read it, it seemed > redundant, but on further readings I saw that it needed to > stay. In the > V2 proposal I put that back in and I don't know how the V3 version had > the strikethrough added again. I have fixed it in the V4 version. > > -Tom > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On > >Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom > >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:52 AM > >To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; Maidment, Matthew R; > sv-bc@server.eda.org > >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST > > > >I agree. > > > >Shalom > > > >> > SVDB 1339 ___Yes _X_No > >> > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339 > >> > >> I think striking the phrase "not preceded by a backslash" is > >> the wrong thing to do. Since the preceding sentence is > >> talking about preceding a newline with a backslash, this > >> phrase is necessary in order to make it clear that it not the > >> backslash-newline that ends the macro text. I will change my > >> vote to yes if this phrase is left in. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Intel Israel (74) Limited > > > >This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > >the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > >by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > >recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > > >-- > >This message has been scanned for viruses and > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Nov 29 10:00:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:00:34 PST