The 'v3' version, at least. Gord's BNF issues appear to be fixed there.SVDB 2217 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217SVDB 329 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=329
There's been lots of discussion on this that I haven't been following.SVDB 1338 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1338 SVDB 1339 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339 SVDB 1548 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1548 SVDB 1571 ___Yes ___No _x_ Abstain http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571
SVDB 1619 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619 SVDB 1957 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1957 SVDB 2102 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102 SVDB 2106 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2106 SVDB 2152 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2152 SVDB 2163 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2163
... with friendly amendment: at the end of 11.5.1 paragraph 2 the proposal reads:SVDB 2169 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2169
SVDB 2170 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2170 SVDB 2178 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2178 SVDB 2184 _x__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2184
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 29 2007 - 17:36:40 PST