RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

From: Alsop, Thomas R <thomas.r.alsop_at_.....>
Date: Fri Nov 30 2007 - 14:39:07 PST
My votes.  -Tom

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On
>Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:12 AM
>To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
>Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
>
>I forgot to include:
>
>SVDB 2217 _X_Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217
>
>--
>Matt Maidment
>mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
>>Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:03 AM
>>To: sv-bc@eda.org
>>Subject: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
>>
>>
>>-You have until 8am PST, Monday, December 3, 2007 to respond
>>-An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
>> voters respond with a YES vote.
>>-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by
>>a reason.
>> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference
>>call.
>>-Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug
note
>>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>>
>>As of the November 12, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>>
>>Brad Pierce
>>Shalom Bresticker
>>Cliff Cummings
>>Mark Hartoog
>>Francoise Martinolle
>>Karen Pieper
>>Dave Rich
>>Steven Sharp
>>Gordon Vreugdenhil
>>Stu Sutherland
>>Alex Gran
>>Don Mills
>>Heath Chambers
>>Tom Alsop
>>Doug Warmke
>>Mike Burns
>>
>>SVDB  329 X__Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=329
>>
>>SVDB 1338 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1338
>>
>>SVDB 1339 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339
>>
>>SVDB 1548 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1548
>>
>>SVDB 1571 _X_Yes   ___No[Alsop, Thomas R]  Also with the stipulation
that 1957 passes, which as Shalom has stated shouldn't be an issue.
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571
>>
>>SVDB 1619 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619
>>
>>SVDB 1957 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1957
>>
>>SVDB 2102 _X_Yes   __No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102
>>
>>SVDB 2106 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2106
>>
>>SVDB 2152 ___Yes   ___No[Alsop, Thomas R]  The comment in this mantis
item is that it's resolved in 2097.  
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2152
>>
>>SVDB 2163 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2163
>>
>>SVDB 2169 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2169
>>
>>SVDB 2170 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2170
>>
>>SVDB 2178 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2178
>>
>>SVDB 2184 _X_Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2184
>>
>>--
>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>believed to be clean.
>>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Nov 30 14:39:26 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 14:39:50 PST