Steven Sharp wrote: [...] >> SVDB 2217 ___Yes ___No _X_Abstain >> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217 > > While the proposal seems reasonable enough, I have not had enough time to > fully consider it. If the people involved in the discussions on name > resolution are OK with it, then I will accept their judgement and not > oppose it. > > I do notice that in the description of the resolution of dotted name 4, > it says "the name f.x" instead of "the name f2.x". This should be fixed. Thanks for catching that. I've fixed that part and uploaded the proposal as "...V2". > > Also, the change to rule b) in 22.7 still leaves an incorrect description. > It says to look in the parent module's outermost scope. That was true before > generates. But with generates, it should look in the scope where it was > instantiated in its parent, which may be a generate scope rather than the > outermost scope. It should then search upwards through any nested generate > scopes until it reaches the parent's outermost scope. But that problem is > independent of this Mantis item. Since 2217 has no opposition, I don't want to just make that change in this proposal. I've entered Mantis 2225 for this with a proposal. There are a few other issues as well in the overall description in that it only talks about "modules" and not tasks, functions, programs or interfaces. Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Dec 3 07:20:24 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 03 2007 - 07:20:48 PST