Re: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot: Respond by 8AM PST, Mon, Dec 10, 2007

Matt,

I vote 'Yes' on all of these.  Good proposals!

-- Brad 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Maidment, Matthew R
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 10:29 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot: Respond by 8AM PST, Mon, Dec 10,
2007

All, please vote on 1571 as well.

SVDB 1571 ___Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571

Thanks.

Matt
  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of 
>Maidment, Matthew R
>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:59 AM
>To: sv-bc@eda.org
>Subject: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot: Respond by 8AM PST, Mon, Dec 10, 2007
>
>
>-You have until 8am PST, Monday, December 10, 2007 to respond -An issue

>passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible  voters 
>respond with a YES vote.
>-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a 
>reason.
> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference 
>call.
>-Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note
>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). 
>
>As of the November 26, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>
>Brad Pierce        
>Shalom Bresticker  
>Cliff Cummings      
>Mark Hartoog        
>Francoise Martinolle
>Karen Pieper       
>Dave Rich          
>Steven Sharp       
>Gordon Vreugdenhil
>Stu Sutherland
>Alex Gran
>Don Mills
>Heath Chambers
>Tom Alsop
>Doug Warmke
>Mike Burns
>
>
>SVDB 1339 ___Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339
>
>SVDB 1345 ___Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1345
>
>SVDB 1583 ___Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1583
>
>SVDB 1809 ___Yes   ___No
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1809
>
>SVDB 2222 ___Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2222
>
>SVDB 2225 ___Yes   ___No  
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2225
> 
>
>-- 
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.