Don, I did not understand the 3rd bullet on the 1st page: -- If a reference to an identifier in the target instance context is used in an override, it shall be the only term in the expression. What is this talking about? And why is the next bullet (-- A hierarchical identifier in a parameter override shall be resolved starting in the context of the configured instance. If a hierarchical identifier is used, it must be the only term in the expression, i.e., a.b.c + 7 is invalid.) not covered by it? However, other than that and some minor editorial quibbles on the 1st page, I don't have a problem with it. I think it is better placed as 32.4.3 rather than 32.9. Regards, Shalom ________________________________ From: Don Mills [mailto:mills@lcdm-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:12 PM To: Bresticker, Shalom Cc: Maidment, Matthew R; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com; Clifford E. Cummings; Mark Hartoog; Francoise Martinolle; Karen Pieper; Rich, Dave; Steven Sharp; Gordon Vreugdenhil; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; Gran, Alex; Heath Chambers; Alsop, Thomas R; Warmke, Doug; michael.burns@freescale.com; sv-bc Subject: Re: E-mail Ballot Due Dec 17 8AM PST Likewise for proposal 2037 BTW- I worked with my technical writer last night to clean up grammar and I removed the section on positional notation. I think I now have something we can address in the email vote. Bresticker, Shalom wrote: Since eda.org is down, here are the proposals for 1602, 2097, 2106. -- ========================================================== Don Mills mills@lcdm-eng.com www.lcdm-eng.com ========================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Dec 12 13:34:45 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 12 2007 - 13:34:57 PST