RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 2097

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Dec 11 2007 - 06:15:53 PST
Following Matt's comments that the last paragraph in 10.6.2 in the
proposal was unclear, I reworked it. Please review now. 

Thanks,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 11:01 AM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 2097
> 
> I updated the proposal for Mantis 2097 based on the comments 
> at the Oct
> 29 meeting and recent emails. I would like to approve this 
> proposal at Monday's meeting.
> 
> The changes relative to the original proposal are:
> 
> (Words between **'s are struck out in the proposal from the 
> current LRM
> text):
> 
> 1. In the sentence in 10.6.1, "The assign procedural 
> continuous assignment statement shall override all procedural 
> assignments **or continuous assignment to a variable**," 
> leave in the words "to a variable".
> 
> 2. In the sentence in 10.6.1, "It shall not **be an unpacked 
> array reference or** a bit-select or a part-select of a 
> variable," leave in the word "be".
> 
> 3. In 10.6.2, "The left-hand side of the assignment can be a 
> reference to singular variable," add the word "a" before "singular".
> 
> 4. In 10.6.2, the sentence, "The left-hand side of the 
> assignment can be a reference to ... a constant part-select 
> of a vector net..." remains unchanged. After Mantis 2169, the 
> phrase "constant part-select" now has the meaning which is 
> desired here.
> 
> 5. In 10.6.2, "Releasing a variable that currently has an 
> active assign procedural continuous assignment shall cause an 
> immediate reevaluation and reestablish that assignment.", 
> changed "an immediate reevaluation"
> to "a reevaluation".
> 
> 6. In 10.6.2, changed
> "A single force or release statement shall not be applied to 
> the whole or the select part of a variable that is being 
> assigned by a mixture of continuous and procedural assignments," to 
> 
> "A force or release statement shall not be applied to a 
> variable that is being assigned by a mixture of continuous 
> and procedural assignments."
> 
> Thanks,
> Shalom
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential 
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any 
> review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender 
> and delete all copies.
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


Received on Wed Dec 12 15:37:11 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 12 2007 - 15:38:01 PST