>Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:23:58 -0700 >From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com> >You have >to talk separately about the fact that collapsing ignores >directions and thus allows reads/writes to the collapsed net. That >is not the same as coercing a port and if the two concepts become >tied together while trying to clarify the read/write rules, you'll >continue to get objections. Except that I am going to object to anything that further legitimizes the idea that coercion is an actual operation different from the side-effect of collapsing ports. This text was trying to describe what Verilog-XL does, and Verilog-XL does not do deliberate coercion. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Dec 13 13:57:17 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 13 2007 - 13:57:59 PST