RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jan 29 2008 - 04:22:49 PST

Hi, 

> An empty "initial" is not crazy, and could easily be created 
> by a parameterised macro in some situations.

Yes, I agree it could, but it was not in 1364-2001 or even 1364-2005.

Shalom

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Tue Jan 29 04:23:52 2008

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF"
Previous message: Jonathan Bromley: "RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF"
In reply to: Jonathan Bromley: "RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF"
Next in thread: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF"
Reply: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 29 2008 - 04:24:04 PST