[sv-bc] RE: Mantis 1526, 1709

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Feb 11 2008 - 04:00:40 PST
I take it back.
11.4.14.1 has this example:

The LRM has this example (in 11.4.14.1 in Draft 4):

byte q[$];
q = {<<byte{p}}; 

I think the LRM should be more explicit about the ability to assign a
streaming concatenation to an unpacked aggregate to clarify that 7.6's
"A packed array cannot be directly assigned to an unpacked array without
an explicit cast," does not apply here.

At least one vendor thinks it is illegal.

Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Feb 11 04:06:31 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 11 2008 - 04:08:08 PST