Minor editorial corrections to 2008: 1. Should say that it is dependent on 2005. If 2005 is not approved, 2008 is not either. 2. In 12.4.2.1, "mature, or be confirmed for reporting". It might not be clear to some that "be confirmed for reporting" is an explanation of "mature". I suggest to change "or" to "i.e.". 3. I think "process'" is incorrect. Either "process" or "process's". Leaving off the "s" at the end is when the subject is plural. 4. In 12.4.2.2, "assertion a1". "a1" should not be called an "assertion". It's called a "process" elsewhere. 5. In 12.5.3.1, "case-item" should be "case_item" in italics. See Mantis 1041. 6. In 12.5.3.2, "(See 12.4.2.3)" should be "(See 12.4.2.2)". I have no substantive objections. > Ah yes, I wasn't thinking of scheduling semantics and focused > in on just that one process. Okay, I'll make it "could be" > and upload the proposal again. Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Feb 17 05:43:55 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 17 2008 - 05:44:33 PST