Following up to http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/8102.html I vote as follows SVDB 1828 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1828 It shouldn't be 'should'. I propose instead that both these sentences should be deleted. Of course, a tool can perform additional checks. Why not? And there are no definitions in the LRM anyway for "combinational", "sequential" and "latched". But, if we're OK with the lack of definitions, then the sentences should be about the indication of user intent, not about the behavior of software tools. SVDB 2008 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2008 As discussed in http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/8093.html , in the proposal, 'error' is mentioned many times, e.g., "no error will be reported" "violation checks shall be immune to false errors" Yet the examples talk about "a warning" and the new text also refers to "a tool-specific warning mechanism". Which is it, warning or error? SVDB 2219 __X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2219 SVDB 2043 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2043 SVDB 1564 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1564 -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:57 AM To: sv-bc@eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot due Monday, Feb 18, 8AM PST -You have until 8am PST, Monday, February 18, 2008 to respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason. The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call. -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). As of the February 4, 2008 meeting, the eligible voters are: Brad Pierce Shalom Bresticker Cliff Cummings Mark Hartoog Francoise Martinolle Karen Pieper Dave Rich Steven Sharp Gordon Vreugdenhil Stu Sutherland Alex Gran Don Mills Heath Chambers Tom Alsop Doug Warmke Mike Burns SVDB 1828 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1828 SVDB 2008 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2008 SVDB 2219 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2219 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Feb 17 19:03:33 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 17 2008 - 19:04:11 PST