RE: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Tue Feb 19 2008 - 06:01:58 PST
I raised an issue a while back in the sv-ac...

Do people think the elab_ prefix is required? Isn't the context of the
placement of the statement enough? We don't require elab_if elab_for
elab_case, elab_assert.

Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:10 AM
> To: sv-bc
> Cc: Eduard Cerny
> Subject: FW: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:01 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom
> Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have posted a new proposal to accommodate Gordon's comments. I kept
> $elab_fatal but with a slightly different explanation.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ed
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Bresticker, Shalom
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:33 AM
> > To: sv-ac@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 9:28 PM
> > To: SV_BC List
> > Subject: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al
> >
> > This came up in today's meeting.  My earlier comments and Ed Cerny's
> > response can be found at:
> >     http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/8040.html
> >
> > I don't have deep concerns with $elab_error as such but raised
> concerns
> > about "error" versus "fatal" and how predictable such things would
be
> in
> > various tools.
> >
> > I think that I'd vote against 1769 as is but Ed has already
indicated
> a
> > willingness to address my concerns.
> >
> > Gord.
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
> > Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Intel Israel (74) Limited
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material
for
> > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
> > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Feb 19 06:03:02 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 19 2008 - 06:03:36 PST