I raised an issue a while back in the sv-ac... Do people think the elab_ prefix is required? Isn't the context of the placement of the statement enough? We don't require elab_if elab_for elab_case, elab_assert. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On > Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:10 AM > To: sv-bc > Cc: Eduard Cerny > Subject: FW: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:01 PM > To: Bresticker, Shalom > Cc: sv-ac@eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al > > Hi, > > I have posted a new proposal to accommodate Gordon's comments. I kept > $elab_fatal but with a slightly different explanation. > > Best regards, > Ed > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of > > Bresticker, Shalom > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:33 AM > > To: sv-ac@eda.org > > Subject: [sv-ac] FW: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] > On > > Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 9:28 PM > > To: SV_BC List > > Subject: [sv-bc] BC review of 1769 - $elab_fatal et al > > > > This came up in today's meeting. My earlier comments and Ed Cerny's > > response can be found at: > > http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/8040.html > > > > I don't have deep concerns with $elab_error as such but raised > concerns > > about "error" versus "fatal" and how predictable such things would be > in > > various tools. > > > > I think that I'd vote against 1769 as is but Ed has already indicated > a > > willingness to address my concerns. > > > > Gord. > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 > > Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Feb 19 06:03:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 19 2008 - 06:03:36 PST