[sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] always_comb LRM e.g. wrong?

An intra-assignment delay in a nonblocking assignment does not block.
 
Shalom


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha
	Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:16 PM
	To: sv-ec@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ec] always_comb LRM e.g. wrong?
	
	
	Hi,
	In SV 1800-2005 LRM page 146 there is an e.g.:
	always_comb 
	d <= #1ns b & c;
	
	Also it is mentioned there:
	Statements in an always_comb shall not include those that block,
have blocking timing or event controls, or fork...join statements.
	
	With that context, the e.g. is wrong as a blocking timing
control is present. SV 1800-2008 draft4 version removes that
restriction. Is it purposefully done?
	
	-- 
	Regards
	Surya

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.