[sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] always_comb LRM e.g. wrong?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Thu Feb 28 2008 - 06:55:13 PST
Well, if you insist:

1. NCV does flag it.
2. It was not clear until Mantis 1468 that the same restrictions apply
to always_latch.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:28 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom
> Cc: sv-ec@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] always_comb LRM e.g. wrong?
> 
> Hi Shalom,
> The following code snippet:
>     always_latch
>         fork
>         d <= #1ns b & c;
>         join
> 
> Should be erroneous. Right? But that also passed by most of 
> the simulator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Feb 28 07:00:35 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 28 2008 - 07:00:49 PST