>SVDB 1465 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1465 I believe this matches the original more convoluted description, and fills in some holes that were left. Well done. I do see a "signed" that is not bolded in the comment on mh1. >SVDB 1769 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1769 > >SVDB 2269 ___Yes _X_No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2269 I have concerns with the added sentences saying "The array elements shall be of type bit if the expression inside the cast is 2-state, otherwise they shall be of type logic." The statement itself is fairly innocuous, especially since it is so hard to observe whether a value in the 2-state value set is bit or logic. But it may lead the reader to misinterpretations about what it means for an expression to be 2-state. Also, we are claiming that signed'() is equivalent to $signed(), and I would maintain that the result of $signed() is always a vector of logic, since there was nothing else in 1364 where it originated. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Mar 24 20:44:16 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 24 2008 - 20:44:58 PDT