Well, if there is no direction and no type, then it does not need a declaration either. Shalom > ]If you had a null port at the beginning, I guess the current > ]rules would ]define it as a non-ANSI style port list, and > then the rest of the ]subclause would not be applicable. > > Yes, except that if a port belongs to a non-ANSI style port > list, "port direction and type declarations shall be declared > after the port list," according to the latest form of the > proposal for 1465. > And it's a little hard to declare port direction and type for > a null port, either inside or outside the port list. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Apr 3 05:56:46 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 03 2008 - 05:57:01 PDT