RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] RE: [P1800] RE: [sv-cc] New P1800 technical committee - Call For Participation - reminder

They were supposed to be guidelines. I understand the need to restrict
the issues and not give this new committee free reign. However the list
was not firm when the WG approved the committee. Any item on "the list"
should be well justified. It's just that we shouldn't have to back to
the WG to add something to "the list"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:03 AM
> To: Rich, Dave; john.havlicek@freescale.com; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com;
sv-
> ac@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org; sv-cc@server.eda.org; sv-
> ec@server.eda.org; ieee1800@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] RE: [P1800] RE: [sv-cc] New P1800
technical
> committee - Call For Participation - reminder
> 
> But it should be clear what the charter of the committee is.
> Did the WG intend the committee to deal with a specific subject (and
> closely-related subjects), or did it intend for the committee to deal
> with whatever it decides it would like to? I think the former is
closer
> to the WG's intent.
> 
> Shalom
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.