RE: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need Champion review of clause 12.5.3

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 30 2008 - 08:40:47 PDT
I noticed one sentence in the new 12.4.2.1 came out in black instead of
blue. I fixed that already.
A lot of the keywords came out in Times font instead of Courier. I'll
trust the editor to handle those. What's important is that they are in
bold, so they are easy to spot.
 
Shalom


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
	Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 6:13 PM
	To: Alsop, Thomas R
	Cc: sv-bc
	Subject: RE: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need Champion review of
clause 12.5.3
	
	
	How about this?
	 
	Shalom


________________________________

		From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
		Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:53 AM
		To: Alsop, Thomas R
		Cc: sv-bc
		Subject: RE: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need Champion
review of clause 12.5.3
		
		
		Tom,
		 
		He can't just copy and paste them. There are change bars
to deal with, the side boxes noting the Mantis numbers, font fixes
(e.g., keywords needs to be bold), red strikeouts disappear in Draft 6,
and blue additions in Draft 5 become black in Draft 6.
		 
		Shalom


________________________________

			From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
			Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 5:52 AM
			To: Alsop, Thomas R; sv-bc
			Subject: RE: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need
Champion review of clause 12.5.3
			
			
			Tom,
			 
			I have NOT yet looked at the new proposal, but I
think it would be enough to write in the Note to Editor that the
proposal is relative to Draft 5.
			 
			Shalom


________________________________

				From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Alsop, Thomas R
				Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:53 AM
				To: sv-bc
				Subject: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need
Champion review of clause 12.5.3
				
				

				Stu,

				 

				I have taken the previous version of
this proposal and now reworked it on top of Draft5. I have uploaded it
to EDA.org. Here is my note to the editor now:
				
				(Note to Editor: The sections below
contain the changes from Mantis items 1041, 1294, 2131, and 1345 are all
merged into this version of 2008. All these changes were done on top of
Draft5. In essence clause 12.4.2 and 12.5.3 can be cut and pasted into
Draft6. Clauses 12.4.2.1, 12.4.2.2, 12.5.3.1, and 12.5.3.2 are new to
Draft6").
				
				I sifted through this one sentence at a
time. I noticed a couple of very subtle changes that I had to make in
12.5.3 on top of what I already had in my proposal WRT to what I saw in
Draft5. Enough that I would ask the champions to review only this
clause. All the other clauses are okay.

				 

				In particular this sentence was added in
the 4th paragraph of 12.5.3 "If the case is qualified as unique0, the
simulator implementation shall not issue a violation report if no case
item case_item matches"  

				 

				I tried to be careful to keep the
strikethroughs that you had too.

				 

				Thanks, -Tom


				-- 
				This message has been scanned for
viruses and 
				dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
				believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
			Intel Israel (74) Limited
			
			This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential material for
			the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
review or distribution
			by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended
			recipient, please contact the sender and delete
all copies.

			-- 
			This message has been scanned for viruses and 
			dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
			believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
		Intel Israel (74) Limited
		
		This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
		the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
		by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended
		recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.

		-- 
		This message has been scanned for viruses and 
		dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
		believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Intel Israel (74) Limited
	
	This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
	the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
	by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
	recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Apr 30 08:43:55 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 08:44:37 PDT