I consider all of these to be editorial issues, which could be added as a bug note for the editor (me) to take care when the proposal is added to the LRM. Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland stuart@sutherland-hdl.com +1-503-692-0898 www.sutherland-hdl.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Gordon Vreugdenhil > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 7:41 AM > To: Dave Rich > Cc: sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Mantis 1809 > > Dave, thanks so much for making so much progress on this. > > Shalom caught a couple of things and I have a few additional things > that I think > we need to do. > > > 1) > > One of Stu's concerns was the use of "we" and similar. The following > paragraph still uses "we": > > For the purpose of describing how identifiers resolve to wildcard > imported > declarations we define what are a locally visible and potentially > locally > visible identifiers. > > Since the paragraph is purely expository introduction and is followed > by the definitions, I think we can just strike that paragraph. > > > 2) > > In the text following example 2: > The declaration x from package p becomes > "x" and "p" should be in fixed font. > > > 3) > > In example 4, keywords aren't in bold. > > 4) > > Just after example 4: > but only the wildcard import p::* that > the "p::*" should be in fixed font. > > > 5) > > In a couple of the examples, line breaks occur in the pdf in the > middle of a comment of SV code. We should make sure that the > comments remain intact. The examples following the > text "Other than for task and function names (see 22.7.1)" have > this problem as does the first example in 22.7.1 > > > > Gord. > > > > Brad Pierce wrote: > > Proposal is attached for easier review. > > > > > > > > n Brad > > > > > > > > *From:* owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] *On Behalf > Of > > *Rich, Dave > > *Sent:* Monday, July 21, 2008 4:56 PM > > *To:* sv-bc@eda.org > > *Subject:* [sv-bc] Mantis 1809 > > > > > > > > New proposal uploaded and should be reviewed. It's very late. > > > > > > > > David Rich > > Verification Technologist > > Design Verification & Test Division > > Mentor Graphics Corporation > > dave_rich@mentor.com > > Office: 408 487-7206 > > Cell: 510 589-2625 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, > and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, > and is > > believed to be clean. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 > Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jul 21 20:11:09 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 21 2008 - 20:11:46 PDT