[sv-bc] RE: functional if statement

From: Kapil Kaushik <kkapil_at_.....>
Date: Tue Dec 09 2008 - 06:02:27 PST
Hi Shalom,

 

Thanks for the clarification.

 

Regards,

Kapil

 

________________________________

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:28 PM
To: Kapil Kaushik; sv-ac@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org;
sv-ec@server.eda.org
Cc: Satyakam Sudershan
Subject: RE: functional if statement

 

Should be.

 

Shalom

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Kapil Kaushik [mailto:kkapil@Magma-DA.COM] 
	Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:51 PM
	To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ac@server.eda.org;
sv-bc@server.eda.org; sv-ec@server.eda.org
	Cc: Satyakam Sudershan
	Subject: RE: functional if statement

	Yes, sorry, a typo on my part.

	After correction, are the two equivalent?

	 

	Thanks,

	Kapil

	
________________________________


	From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
	Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:45 PM
	To: Kapil Kaushik; sv-ac@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org;
sv-ec@server.eda.org
	Cc: Satyakam Sudershan
	Subject: RE: functional if statement

	 

	I don't see the connection between this and standards work, but
I'll answer anyway.

	What you probably want is

	dout <= enable ? din : dout;

	 

	Shalom

		 

		
________________________________


		From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Kapil Kaushik
		Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:05 PM
		To: sv-ac@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org;
sv-ec@server.eda.org
		Cc: Satyakam Sudershan
		Subject: [sv-bc] functional if statement

		Hi,

		 

		I have the following piece of rtl:

		 

		always @(posedge ck54 or negedge p_rst_x) begin

		    if (~p_rst_x) 

		      dout <= 3'd0;     

		    else 

		      dout <= func( enable, din);

		      // if (enable)      // Works fine

		        // dout = din;   // Works fine

		      end

		      

		      function    func; 

		  input     enable;     

		  input din;

		  reg temp; 

		 

		    begin

		      if (enable) 

		        temp = din;

		      func = temp;            // Latch inferred

		 

		    end

		  endfunction

		 

		Given the above description, can I replace the command
"dout <= func(enable,din)" by "dout <= enable ? din : 1'bx"?

		Kindly suggest.

		 

		Thanks,

		Kapil

		
		-- 
		This message has been scanned for viruses and 
		dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
		believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Intel Israel (74) Limited
	 
	This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
	the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
	by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
	recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Dec 9 06:05:31 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 09 2008 - 06:06:14 PST