RE: [sv-bc] Config declaration BNF bug?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Wed Dec 10 2008 - 06:17:06 PST
Not your fault.
This line was added in Mantis 2037, later than 979.
What may have deceived us is that the LRM we used as a reference for 2037 may not have had 979 implemented in it.

Shalom
 

> It looks as though this was an oversight in Mantis 979.
> Sorry, I should have picked it up when trawling for 
> "localparam" issues in relation to Mantis 1134.
> Configurations aren't very high on my radar, and it seems 
> that I'm not the only one...
> --
> Jonathan Bromley
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Dec 10 06:18:46 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 10 2008 - 06:19:14 PST