RE: [sv-bc] Config declaration BNF bug?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Thu Dec 11 2008 - 21:23:38 PST
I filed this as Mantis 2542. Since this is not a pure editorial error, I guess it will have to be a ballot comment.

Shalom

________________________________
From: Don Mills [mailto:mills@lcdm-eng.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:20 AM
To: Bresticker, Shalom
Cc: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com; sv-bc@server.eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Config declaration BNF bug?

Shalom - Your assumption is correct about the LRM version used for reference.  So what do I  (we) need to fix this?

Bresticker, Shalom wrote:

Not your fault.
This line was added in Mantis 2037, later than 979.
What may have deceived us is that the LRM we used as a reference for 2037 may not have had 979 implemented in it.

Shalom




It looks as though this was an oversight in Mantis 979.
Sorry, I should have picked it up when trawling for
"localparam" issues in relation to Mantis 1134.
Configurations aren't very high on my radar, and it seems
that I'm not the only one...
--
Jonathan Bromley




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.





--
==========================================================
Don Mills
mills@lcdm-eng.com<mailto:mills@lcdm-eng.com>
www.lcdm-eng.com<http://www.lcdm-eng.com>
==========================================================

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Dec 11 21:25:49 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 11 2008 - 21:27:20 PST