Re: [sv-bc] Is 'let' item allowed to be hierarchically referred?

Hi Dmitry,
I want mean an 'item' as the 'argument'. For e.g.
let ones_match(bits x, y) = x == y;

Here I want to mean 'x' or 'y'. Is it allowed to refer them as 
'ones_match.x' or 'ones_match.y'?
Sorry for the confusion.

Regards
Surya



-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re:[sv-bc] Is 'let' item allowed to be hierarchically referred?
From: Korchemny, Dmitry <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
To: Surya Pratik Saha <spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com>, sv-bc@eda.org 
<sv-bc@eda.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:32:05 PM
> Hi Surya,
>
> But no item can be declared inside let.
>
> Dmitry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:53 PM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Is 'let' item allowed to be hierarchically referred?
>
> Hi,
> As per 1800-2009 draft LRM, a let expression can not be hierarchically
> referred, but is any item (typed or untyped) declared inside 'let'
> construct allowed to be hierarchically referred? I think it should not
> be, but I did not see anything mentioned in the LRM.
>
> --
> Regards
> Surya
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
>
>
>   




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.