[sv-bc] Re: Out-of-bound index for part select on concatenation

I am sorry, LRM indeed allows bit select too. But my 2nd question is 
still valid.

Regards
Surya



-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Out-of-bound index for part select on concatenation
From: Surya Pratik Saha <spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com>
To: sv-bc@eda.org <sv-bc@eda.org>
Date: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:18:38 PM
> Hi,
> In 1800-2009 draft LRM, a new construct is added as part select of 
> concatenation. Is there any reason for which bit select is not 
> allowed. For e.g.
> {a, b}[2]
>
> Also, LRM does not mention what will happen if out-of-bound index is 
> used in the part select expression. For e.g.
> {a, b}[-1:2]
> Whereas, -1 is an invalid index here. Can anyone explain on that?
>




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.