RE: [sv-bc] Is 'let' item allowed to be hierarchically referred?

In http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/9153.html Gordon Vreugdenhil writes:

> A "let" [...] is similar to a macro (other than a few of the
> name binding aspects and the fact that the let definition name
> is in some scope).

Another difference is that a let can't use the `` directive to construct identifiers.

By the way, why can't a "let" be declared directly within a class scope?

-- Brad

-- This message has been scanned for viruses anddangerous content by MailScanner, and isbelieved to be clean.