RE: [sv-bc] Incorrect text in `define macro section

Hi,

This was discussed. See the bugnotes in Mantis 1090.
The text was deliberately formulated in such a way as to not include such macros.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of David Jones
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 3:47 PM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Incorrect text in `define macro section
>
> Tangentially related question concerning `undefineall:
>
> Should `undefineall affect macros defined on the command line, e.g.
> +define+FOO=BAR?
>
> The LRM states that it shall undefine "all text macros
> previously defined by `define compiler directives" but it's
> not 100% clear that this corner case was considered.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.