[sv-bc] RE: [P1800] March 2009 P1800 Ballot Comments

A few comments after a quick look at the SV-BC issues:

Comments 27, 23, and 180 are the same (Mantis 2550)

Comments 33, 34, and 56 are on the same issue (Mantis 2380). Opinions are split on the resolution.

Comments 32, 42, and 69 are closely related (writing to an array with an invalid index). Note that the LRM appears to be inconsistent: 32 quotes text saying that a warning is optional, whereas 42 quotes text saying that a warning is required (for an associative array). 

Comments 74 and 77 are the same comment on two places.
Comments 75 and 78 are the same comment on two places.

Comment 79 should maybe be sent to SV-EC (function prototype vs. implementation declarations)

Comments 138 and 140 should maybe be sent to SV-EC (virtual interfaces).

Some other comments might be sent to SV-BC from other committees, especially SV-EC.

I expected more duplicates...

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:55 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Cc: Karen Pieper
> Subject: [sv-bc] RE: [P1800] March 2009 P1800 Ballot Comments
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I reformatted the xls, sorting the comments within each 
> committee section by subclause and page. I also added a 
> column for Mantis number.
> 
> Shalom
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ieee1800@server.eda.org
> > [mailto:owner-ieee1800@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Karen Pieper
> > Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 6:24 AM
> > To: SV-AC eda.org; SV-BC eda.org; SV-CC; sv-ec; IEEE 1800
> > Subject: [P1800] March 2009 P1800 Ballot Comments
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, all,
> > 
> > The Ballot Comments from the March 2009 P1800 Ballot can be 
> found at:
> > 
> > 
> http://www.eda.org/twiki/bin/view.cgi/P1800/P1800BallotReviewFeedback
> > 
> > Because this is twiki, we can update this file and work on it.  
> > 
> > Our next step is to look over the ballot feedback for each 
> committee, 
> > and report back to the P1800 by 4/16 as to how long each committee 
> > thinks they require to address the feedback.  The current target is 
> > May 14, 2009.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Karen
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > 
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential 
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any 
> review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender 
> and delete all copies.
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.