Should it be moved to SV-EC, since they are mostly responsible for associative arrays? I don't think SV-BC should drop the restriction on its own. Thanks, Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel LAD DA Jerusalem, Israel +972 2 589 6582 (office) +972 54 721 1033 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 5:37 PM To: SV_BC List Subject: [sv-bc] Issue 41 - real in associative array I took a closer look at issue 41. The LRM certainly does intentionally restrict the existence of "real" in any component of an associative array index type. This is a bit odd since the general statement is simply that equality (and some internal ordering relation) is defined and certainly equality is defined for real. Personally I think that it makes more sense to drop the restriction than to modify the example but if there is any concern about dropping the restriction, then we should modify the example to be consistent with the normative text. Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Apr 24 07:53:12 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 24 2009 - 07:53:24 PDT