[sv-bc] RE: email ballot: Due 8am PDT Friday, May 1

From: Alsop, Thomas R <thomas.r.alsop_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 29 2009 - 18:03:28 PDT
Yes on all but 2675.  See comments below.  -Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:33 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] email ballot: Due 8am PDT Friday, May 1

-You have until 8am PDT, Friday, May 1, 2009 to respond
-An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
 voters respond with a YES vote.
-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
 The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call.
-Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note
       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). 

As of the April 13, 2009 meeting, the eligible voters are:

Brad Pierce      
Mark Hartoog      
Dave Rich          
Gordon Vreugdenhil  
Stu Sutherland  
Alex Gran        
Heath Chambers    
Tom Alsop          
Francoise Martinolle
Cliff Cummings    
Shalom Bresticker  
Don Mills  
Steven Sharp

SVDB 1492 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1492

SVDB 2477 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2477

SVDB 2513 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2513

SVDB 2542 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2542

SVDB 2550 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2550

SVDB 2634 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2634

SVDB 2670 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2670

SVDB 2672 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2672

SVDB 2675 ___Yes   _x_No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2675
[Alsop, Thomas R] While I agree with the proposal and I believe we are heading in the right direction, it actually makes visible some holes that are not handled.  Specifically what happens when the number of addresses or words in the memory file _exceed_ the finish address.  The previous paragraph describes that an error is issued when addresses in the file are out of range.  If we go down the path of just issuing a warning when file and memory range are not equal, but still writing to the memory, won't people just get used to ignoring the warning.  I am just wondering if we should make out of range writes an error like the previous paragraph. In other words if the file has too many words in it, less than the size of the array.  

SVDB 2676 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2676

SVDB 2683 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2683

SVDB 2695 _x_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2695

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Apr 29 18:05:00 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 29 2009 - 18:06:05 PDT