[sv-bc] Re: Mandated warnings -- was Re: [sv-ec] Mantis 2701, ballot ID #44 - Arturo's feedback

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv_at_.....>
Date: Fri May 01 2009 - 07:25:57 PDT
Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
> I also find the following 
> 
>> The recent vote in SV-BC where vendors
>> unanimously opposed a warning on any array bound write violation
>> and users unanimously supported the warning
> 
> very disturbing and not "a good indicator" at all. It indicates a bad disconnect between vendors and users.


That was actually my point -- it is a good indicator
that there is a problem.  I've stated my position on
the problem.

Gord.



> 
> Shalom
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri May 1 07:29:30 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 01 2009 - 07:31:15 PDT