RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)

I guess I'll need to wait until Mantis is resuscitated to find out what his reasoning was in 2395.  I have no recollection of any discussion of this footnote being a bug.

-- Brad

________________________________________
From: Bresticker, Shalom [shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 11:55 AM
To: Bresticker, Shalom; Brad Pierce; SV_BC List
Subject: RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)

Sorry, that should have been Steven, not Stephen.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 9:50 PM
> To: Brad Pierce; SV_BC List
> Subject: RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations
> (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)
>
> 1. It would be a correction, not an enhancement, as pointed
> out by Stephen.
>
> 2. If the response to the ballot comment is to specify
> unambiguously non-ANSI port declaration rules, that
> correction is part of it.
>
> Shalom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
> > [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> > Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 9:41 PM
> > To: SV_BC List
> > Subject: RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations
> > (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)
> >
> > OK, let's start with the proposal to remove the restriction
> > of BNF footnote 15.  Wouldn't that be an enhancement?
> >
> > -- Brad
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Bresticker, Shalom [shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 11:14 AM
> > To: SV_BC List
> > Subject: RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations
> > (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)
> >
> > I have not yet received any comments on my non-ANSI port
> > declaration "declaration of principles" in
> > http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/9427.html.
> >
> > Did people receive it at all?
> >
> > Shalom
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Intel Israel (74) Limited
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
> material for
> > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
> distribution
> > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.