Proposals: 1651, 1791, 2501, 2568, 2611, 2674, 2681, 2721 SVDB 1651 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1651 SVDB 1791 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2791 SVDB 2501 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2501 SVDB 2568 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2568 SVDB 2593 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2593 I think this is overly restrictive change that would make existing designs illegal. Vendors will not be able to enforce this, and it make absolutely no sense to allow the sign to be changed. SVDB 2611 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2611 SVDB 2674 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2674 SVDB 2678 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2678 SVDB 2681 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2681 SVDB 2721 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2721 I really don't see a good reason for this restriction. It is, of course, possible to get carried away with bind and abuse it, but there are reasonable uses that this restriction would disallow. The following Mantis items are proposed to be resolved as: "The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee believes it is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at this time but may be considered for future revisions." SVDB 2580 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2580 SVDB 2669 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2669 SVDB 2671 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2671 SVDB 2673 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2673 SVDB 2679 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2679 SVDB 2684 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2684 SVDB 2686 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2686 SVDB 2687 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2687 SVDB 2688 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2688 SVDB 2689 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2689 SVDB 2690 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 SVDB 2691 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2691 SVDB 2697 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2697 SVDB 2720 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2720 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun May 10 17:25:10 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 10 2009 - 17:26:03 PDT