>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com> >I agree, but I think it should be made more explicit. I have uploaded two new variations of the proposal. The first states that the value of the name is the value after the cast. It then relies on the fact that the descriptions of these other situations refer to the value of the name. The second variation goes further and tries to state that this really is the value used in those situations. This is more explicit, but risks somebody getting confused between the full descriptions of those situations, and the abbreviated description here. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon May 11 08:33:00 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 11 2009 - 08:33:39 PDT