Here are my votes. >SVDB 1651 ___Yes _X_No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1651 Same reasons as Steve. >SVDB 1791 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2791 > >SVDB 2501 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2501 > >SVDB 2568 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2568 > >SVDB 2593 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2593 > >SVDB 2611 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2611 >SVDB 2674 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2674 > >SVDB 2678 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2678 >SVDB 2681 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2681 > >SVDB 2721 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2721 > >The following Mantis items are proposed to be resolved as: > >"The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee >believes it is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at >this time but may be considered for future revisions." > >SVDB 2580 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2580 > >SVDB 2669 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2669 > >SVDB 2671 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2671 > >SVDB 2673 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2673 > >SVDB 2679 ___Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2679 > >SVDB 2684 __X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2684 > >SVDB 2686 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2686 > >SVDB 2687 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2687 > >SVDB 2688 __X_Yes __No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2688 > >SVDB 2689 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2689 > >SVDB 2690 ___Yes _X__No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 Didn't we resolved this else where? > >SVDB 2691 ___Yes _X__No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2691 > >SVDB 2697 _X__Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2697 > >SVDB 2720 ___Yes _X__No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2720 > >-- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon May 11 09:03:12 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 11 2009 - 09:03:40 PDT