Re: [sv-bc] Question about "let"

In C++, that wouldn't do the trick, but in SV it appears to make all the
difference, Thanks!


Brad Pierce wrote:
> Greg,
>
> When the actual for v gets substituted in, isn't it wrapped in parens, yielding something illegal, such as
>
>               (x)++
>
> -- Brad
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Greg Jaxon [Greg.Jaxon@synopsys.COM]
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:03 PM
> To: SV_BC List
> Subject: [sv-bc] Question about "let"
>
> Are either of the following legal?
>
>      let post_incr(v) = v++;
>
>      let pre_incr(int v) = v++;
>
> If they are, what is the value of the actual arguments after the
> following uses?
>
>      int a = 0 , b = 0;
>      b = post_incr(a);
>      a = pre_incr( b+1 );
>
> My understanding is that at the very least this last usage is illegal,
> but perhaps not, if we regard let as having more of a functional than a
> template interpretation.
>
> Greg Jaxon
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>   


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.