>SVDB 2664 ___Yes _X_No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2664 The last change in the proposal removes the only text that indicates that hierarchical references are not allowed in the compilation unit scope. I am not prepared to do this until we have either added other text that says they are not allowed, or specified rules for how such names should be resolved if we are going to allow them. And yes, I am supposed to be writing a proposal for that. >SVDB 2666 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2666 > >SVDB 2667 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2667 > >SVDB 2668 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2668 > >SVDB 2677 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2677 > >SVDB 2690 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 >Proposal: Resolved by 1492 Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Jun 5 16:09:47 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 05 2009 - 16:12:39 PDT