[sv-bc] Agenda: June 8 SV-BC Meeting

From: Maidment, Matthew R <matthew.r.maidment_at_.....>
Date: Sun Jun 07 2009 - 15:45:32 PDT
SV-BC Ballot Comment Resolution Meeting
Date: Monday, June 08, 2009
Time: 9:00am-11:00am PDT

Toll Free Dial In Number in North America:  1-888-813-5316
Caller Paid Dial In Number: 1-650-584-6338
Meeting ID: 7839818

Agenda

+ Review IEEE patent policy
  http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

+ Review Previous Meeting Minutes
  http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_09_06_01.txt

+ E-mail Vote Results

Issue covered: 2664, 2666, 2667, 2668, 2677, 2690

+ 2380 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2380)

+ 2665 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2665)
Shalom submitted a proposal.  Please review.

+ 2663 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2663)
Steven submitted a proposal.  Please review.

+ 2669 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2669)
Can it be addressed by
1) Stating the desired comment about file ordering is addressed in 3.14.2.2
2) Deprecation either will not be done or will only be considered for future
revision

+ 2678 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2678)
Please review this issue so we can more quickly find consensus on resolution

+ 2697 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2697)
Consider denying altogether or for at least this round.  What about
suggesting alternate means for getting the parameter values, e.g.:
$bits of variables declared with those parameters

+ 2720 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2720)
Per this mail thread: http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/9624.html

"[The submitter] said that our response (that hierarchical names in a bind 
at the compilation unit scope levels were full hierarchical names) addressed
their comment.  They said it would be great if the LRM clarified this
hierarchical resolution."

+ 2593 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2593)
+ 2721 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2721)

Action Items
------------------------
Complete
------------------------
06/01/2009 Matt send e-mail ballot
06/01/2009 Matt add 2380 to June 8 agenda for full discussion 
06/01/2009 Matt track down submitter 2720 to ask for more information.
06/01/2009 Steven to write a proposal for 2663 based on the consensus of 
           limiting to bind statements.
06/01/2009 Shalom to make a proposal to clarify that $unit is not a package 
           except where specfically noted in the LRM.
06/01/2009 Matt add 2665 to agenda whenever 2664 is resolved.
06/01/2009 Matt for 2665 add relation to 2532

Outstanding
------------------------
06/01/2009 All review 2678

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Jun 7 15:46:14 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 07 2009 - 15:46:29 PDT