RE: [sv-bc] RE: E-mail Ballot Due Monday, June 8, 8AM PDT

I vote yes to all. Mark, can you suggest wording you would be OK with
for 2667

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Mark Hartoog
> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 3:26 PM
> To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] RE: E-mail Ballot Due Monday, June 8, 8AM PDT
> 
> SVDB 2664 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2664
> 
> SVDB 2666 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2666
> 
> 
> SVDB 2667 ___Yes   _X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2667
> 
> I think the wording of this proposal is confusing. For example:
> 
> "If a module instance overrides a type parameter, assignments to
parameters
> that depend on the type parameter shall not occur with the default
type."
> 
> I think what this is trying to say is if a parameter assignment would
be
> illegal with the default type, it is not an error as long as the type
> parameter is always overridden with a type that makes it legal.
> 
> SVDB 2668 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2668
> 
> 
> SVDB 2677 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2677
> 
> 
> SVDB 2690 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690
> Proposal:  Resolved by 1492
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.