Yes, it looks like a bug in the BNF. Thanks, Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Dhiraj Kumar Prasad > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 7:54 AM > To: sv-bc@server.eda.org > Cc: Dhiraj Kumar Prasad; Surya Pratik Saha > Subject: [sv-bc] Query related with attribute instance along > with timeunits_declaration. > > Hello, > > I have query related with timeunits_declaration.According to IEEE LRM > P1800.2005,section > 16.2 > > non_port_program_item ::= > .. > { attribute_instance } timeunits_declaration > > Means attribute instance can be specified along with > timeunits_declaration. > > According to BNF,nowhere attribute instance can be specified > along with > timeunits_declaration except > non port program item but most of standard tool fail for the > following > testcase. > > program prog1(); > > (*a,b*)timeunit 1ns; > endprogram > > So my query is this that does the testcase is valid or it's > bug in BNF??. > > Regards, > dhiRAj > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 19 23:31:17 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 19 2009 - 23:32:22 PDT