Bounced mail from John Havlicek in response to http://www.eda.org/sv-ac/hm/8737.html ----- Hi Folks: It seems to me that concurrent assertions in tasks make sense and are allowed by the LRM. The original code examples in the thread are not legal because they try to make the concurrent assertion stand as a task declaration item, which is not allowed. The concurrent assertion inside a task must be a statement item, hence in a procedural context. The Special Committee worked on the semantics of launching concurrent assertions from procedural contexts, and I think that all makes sense. I don't see a good use for concurrent assertions inside functions. The BNF seems to allow them, but there may be restrictions on statements in functions that forbid them. If they are allowed, I think that the effect would be to launch the concurrent assertions as a side effects. I see immediate assertions as useful in functions to check entry conditions, intermediate values, etc. J.H. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Jan 15 10:09:19 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 15 2010 - 10:10:16 PST