<forwarding to the sv-cc, where the DPI issues are handled>
On 01/27/10 17:05, Wilson Snyder wrote:
> 1800-2009 H.10.1.3 states:
>
> "The svDpiVersion() function returns a string indicating
> which DPI standard is supported by the simulator and in
> particular which canonical value representation is being
> provided. For example, a tool that is based on IEEE Std
> 1800-2005, i.e., the VPI-based canonical value, shall return
> the string "1800-2005". Simulators implementing to the prior
> Accellera SV3.1a standards, and thus using the svLogicVec32
> value representa- tion, shall return the string "SV3.1a".
>
> /* Returns either version string "1800-2005" or "SV3.1a" */
> const char* svDpiVersion();
>
> I'd like to confirm if "1800-2005" is indeed correct for a
> 1800-2009 simulator, since this refers also to the VPI which
> does have differences for 1800-2009?
>
> I found mantis bug 2101 reporting a similar issue, however
> this issue was not resolved either way, nor included in the
> 2009 document. It would be good if the resolution could be
> reflected there.
>
> Thanks
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Jan 27 17:15:11 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 27 2010 - 17:15:14 PST