Re: [sv-bc] Is range/signed specification part of explicit data type

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Thu Feb 11 2010 - 21:36:01 PST

Yes, I would agree that these are illegal. A range and/or signed are
not considered an explicit data type.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Thu Feb 11 21:36:20 2010

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Mlynek: "RE: [sv-bc] changing the lifetime of begin end block"
Previous message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] Is range/signed specification part of explicit data type"
Maybe in reply to: Surya Pratik Saha: "[sv-bc] Is range/signed specification part of explicit data type"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 11 2010 - 21:36:24 PST